Juan is a politically liberal supporter of gun control who lives in a large city on the West Coast. He has a preconception that people from rural areas are ignorant and racially biased. His class is going to have a conservative speaker from Alabama to discuss why he supports private ownership of guns and opposes removing Confederate monuments from public places. Given the wide disparity in political views between Juan and the speaker, what is the ethical thing for Juan to do? A. Wear earplugs to symbolize his opposition to the speaker's views
B. Listen to the speaker and learn about the reasoning that support his beliefs
C. Pretend to agree with the speaker and cheer for his views
D. Confront the speaker and shout him down so that his ideas cannot be shared with the class

B. Listen to the speaker and learn about the reasoning that support his beliefs

Explanation:

The correct option is - B. Listen to the speaker and learn about the reasoning that support his beliefs.

Reason -

As the views of Juan and the speaker does not match , so the most ethical thing that Juan can do is to listen to the thoughts and the views of the speaker and learn about the reasoning that supports his beliefs.

Both the views of Juan and the speaker is different.

The speaker supports private ownership of guns and opposes removing Confederate monuments from public places.

as university of miami psychologists debra lieberman and adam smith pointed out in a recent article in the journal current directions in psychological science, humans have social and psychological mechanisms to deter incest. with very few exceptions, marriages between brothers and sisters and between parents and their children are verboten in every human culture. the primary psychological anti-incest mechanism is the yuck response. even the idea of sex with their mom or dad, bro or sis is upsetting to most people. the psychologist jonathan haidt has found that nearly everyone is repelled by the prospect of brother-sister sex, even in hypothetical situations in which there is no chance of pregnancy).

the biological cost of incest

this raises an interesting question: just what’s so bad about incest? sure, having sex with your dad or your sister seems gross — but why? some anthropologists have argued that incest taboos are learned social conventions. this explanation, however, doesn’t make sense to me as it does not explain the widespread existence of anti-incest mechanisms in creatures ranging from cockroaches to chimpanzees. second, the incest taboo is about as close to a universal law as human moral rules get.

why should mechanisms to avoid incest be so widespread both in nature and across human societies? the answer is simple. the problem with having sex close with relatives is that there is an astonishingly high chance that your offspring will be born with a serious birth defect.

answer; (d) none of the above;