U leates an opportunity for rascals to exploit Shenanigans. By lay all citizens must be protected and law
Cannot allow other peoples right to be violated by unruly protestors.
Consequently, the principles of democracy mocratic structures, law-making process
community structures that support democracy
right, somewhere!
all called to question. Something is not
Adapted from www. hsrc. ac. za/en/review/how-dec-2018/service delivery
protests. Accessed on the 22/03/2021
Glossary:
3.1
Shenanigans- those whose intention is to cause mischief/wrong doing
something loose its legitimate status
Define the term public participation an UR ways in which
sustainable provision of services to the community
State FOUR reasons why public participation is important in ensuring
men
protestors may stage a peaceful protes
3.2
(2+4) (6)
(4x1) (4)
be resort violent ways of
3.3 Explain TWO factors that could make
protesting
3.4 Discuss how inefficient public partic
ownership of community services
3.5 Critically discuss how local government
satisfy the public, thereby minimizing sees
a lack of
(4x2) (8)
ways that
Home
(2x4) (8)
( Sub-total 30
Grand-total: 90]​

soothing tone) but quickly, the tone changes from a light tone to a grim one. by introducing disturbing word choices that are illogical.make a list of some of levertov’s images of war from both of her poems. how do her wordsaffect you? do you agree with her position on war? write a short response (at least 100 words) and support your answer with personal experience or your studiespoets can change the tone in a poem, and levertov does when the she refers to "delicate man . .whose eyes/are flowers that perceive the stars”. the word choices here are different. theimages began to show feelings of hope/potential. but this mood is interrupted with the dark oppressive words "entrails of still-alive babies" and "carcass-gulleys". levertov continues to switch tones by "the deep intelligence living at peace would have"—one is left with a sense of hope. i can connect with her words that humans can do better things than fight in war. we only have one life so dying in a war would be for no reason. also, i am a christian and in the bible, it says "thou shall not kill", and i strongly believe in that.people respond differently to satire—some like it, others don't get it. in at least 150 words, describe what you think of goines's narrative essay. discuss whether you think his position is convincing.the satire kept people's attention, rather than just rambling. instead of being dead serious, he adds humor to enlighten it. i think he did a good job of proving his point, but convincing people to stray from their own beliefs is hard, and satire can be offensive to that person. overall i think that goines's narrative essay was good because narrative essay create deeper understanding. i also like that the narrative essay is in first-person. the essay was filled with diction and word choice to let you know that the essay is going to be witty yet satirical. his point was to write  

explanation:

they had freedom from the government and from the affairs