On what grounds did the Supreme Court assert the power of judicial review in the case of Marbury v Madison? Group of answer choices

If the Supreme Court did not overturn some laws, state governments would challenge unpopular laws on their own.

Supreme Court justices are less subject to popular pressure than others since they are appointed for life.

It is the role of the courts to interpret and apply the law, and the Constitution is the highest law.

The Supreme Court is more neutral than either Congress or the President.

I'm pretty sure the answer is... It is the role of the courts to interpret and apply the law, and the Constitution is the highest law. This all ties back to judicial review where the courts can label something unconstitutional also ties back to checks and balances where each branch has a specific power and job.

the answer is a quran

question 1: the kuwaiti government announced us$1.5 million in aid for rohingya refugees.they pointed out that it was imperative to take immediate and concrete steps to ramp up pressure on myanmar to put an end to the violence.and said   that they r just shameful

question 2: the rohingyas were not aloud to be seen as people in myanmar.in the last few years, before the latest crisis, thousands of rohingya were making perilous journeys out of myanmar to escape communal violence or alleged abuses by the security forces.the latest exodus began on 25 august 2017 after rohingya arsa militants launched deadly attacks on more than 30 police posts.rohingyas arriving in an area known as cox's bazaar - a district in bangladesh - say they fled after troops, backed by local buddhist mobs, responded by burning their villages and attacking and killing civilians.