subject
Social Studies, 31.03.2021 20:40 harh5863

Respecto a la crisis sanitaria por la que atravesamos todos los paraguayos y comenta brevemente acerca del grado de acatamiento del protocolo sanitario establecido y las consecuencias que ha ocasionado a la población en la actualidad. (Incluye en tu comentario tu propia opinión y lo que has estudiado en ésta clase)

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 10:40
The specific department of health and human services (hhs) regulations that apply to research with children are known as: subpart b: additional protections for children involved as subjects in researchsubpart a: the common rulesubpart d: additional protections for children involved as subjects in researchsubpart c: protections for children in research
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 17:10
In writing about her findings in a brazilian shantytown, nancy scheper-hughes’s account of alto do cruzeiro provides a window into the terrible toll of nonconsensual organ harvesting among the poor, as well as how she herself changed over time. how might an anthropologist justify the publication of this ethnographic research when considering the problem of ethnographic authority? a. all of the poor must be given an equal voice, thus polyvocality is justification. b. anthropologists are themselves changed in fieldwork, and so honest reflexivity is justification. c. the horrific conditions made it impossible to ignore, and since she obtained informed consent, this is justification. d. authoritative writing asks us to consider what right we have to report, thus a moral challenge is justification.
Answers: 3
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 01:50
What is the cause of their extinction
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 06:00
Ahusband who believed that his wife was having an affair with his brother hired an arsonist to burn down the brother's house. they planned for the husband to take his brother to a ballgame so that the arsonist would be able to set the house on fire without detection. after the husband and brother left for the ballgame, however, the arsonist decided to abandon the plan and immediately left town without doing anything further. when the husband returned from the ballgame with the brother, he saw the house still standing and blurted out what was supposed to have happened. the husband and the arsonist were arrested and charged with conspiracy to commit arson. at the arsonist's trial, his attorney argued that he was innocent of the conspiracy because he decided not to go ahead with the plan, and nothing criminal had in fact occurred.at common law, how should a jury find the arsonist? a not guilty of conspiracy, because going to a ballgame is not a criminal overt act.b not guilty of conspiracy, because the husband, not the arsonist, committed the overt act.c guilty, because the husband executed his part of the plan.d guilty, because the arsonist agreed to set the brother's house on fire.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Respecto a la crisis sanitaria por la que atravesamos todos los paraguayos y comenta brevemente acer...
Questions
question
English, 12.04.2021 22:20
question
English, 12.04.2021 22:20
Questions on the website: 13722361