subject
Social Studies, 31.03.2021 02:20 jahzz

the supreme court's decision that someone cannot yell "fire!" in a crowed theater just to be funny relates mostly to the blank amendment.


the supreme court's decision that someone cannot yell fire! in a crowed theater just to be funny

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 01:30
An artist entered into a written agreement to sell a patron a partially finished painting once it was complete. the patron later learned that the artist planned to sell the painting to a third party who offered to pay the artist more than the contract price. the patron filed suit to compel the artist to sell the painting to her in accord with the terms of their agreement, while the artist denied that the painting the artist planned to sell to the third party was the subject of the agreement with the patron. at trial, the patron did not introduce the written agreement or explain its absence. rather, the patron sought to testify that, when she signed the agreement, the artist had pointed to the painting in question and stated that it was the patron’s painting. the artist’s attorney objected to the testimony that the artist identified the painting as belonging to the patron. how should the court rule? asustain the objection, because the artist’s statement was hearsay. bsustain the objection, because the patron failed to produce the written agreement or explain its absence. coverrule the objection, because the statement is not hearsay. doverrule the objection, because the statement was relevant.
Answers: 3
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 13:30
In ancient egypt, the pharaoh collected from the peasant farmers. a. oil b. gold c. lumber d. taxes
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 17:00
Why are the majority of the world's economies mixed? what may happen to the "pure" types of economies (traditional, socialist/command, market capitalist) when they incorporate elements from other economic models?
Answers: 3
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 17:30
The platt amendment of 1901 forbade cuba from entering into any treaties that would allow undue foreign involvement in cuban affairs. this law was passed after the spanish-american war to make sure that european nations weren’t going to get involved with cuba. 1, why might the platt amendment be considered ironic? 2, what reasons would the united states have for not wanting european influence in cuba?
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
the supreme court's decision that someone cannot yell "fire!" in a crowed theater just to be funny r...
Questions
question
History, 22.04.2021 21:30
question
Mathematics, 22.04.2021 21:30
question
Mathematics, 22.04.2021 21:30
question
Mathematics, 22.04.2021 21:30
Questions on the website: 13722360