4. Taon na ipinatupad ang mapang-aping batas Gawain sa Pagkatuto Bliang 7: Panuto: Isulat sa sagutang papel ang
hinihinigi sa bawat bilang, piliin ito sa loob ng kahon.
monopolyo
buwin tabako 1571
8 reales
12 reales
kasama
Haciendero
mga katutubo sa Ilocos at Cagayan
1. mga magsasakang nangungupahan sa kanilang lupang sakahan
2. naghimagsik laban sa mapang-aping sistema ng pagbubuwis ng mga
Espanyol
3. sitwasyon kung saan kontrolado o hawak lamang ng isang kompanya o
may kapangyarihan ang industriya o pagtutustos ng isang bagay o
,
ng mananakop na Espanyol
5. takdang halagang ibinabayad ng mga mamamayan o korporasyon sa
pamahalaan upang magamit sa maayos na pagpapatakbo ng bansa
6. halaga ng tributo o buwis noong una itong ipinatupad noong 1571
7. halaga ng tributo o buwis noong 1851 mula sa dating 8 reales
8. halamang may malalaking dahong pinatuyo at ginagamit sa paggawa ng
sigarilyo
9. may ari ng lupa sa sistemang kasama; kadalasan sila ay mga Espanyol
10. Taon na naitatag ang Royal Company of the Philippines
ibaba ​

Adefendant visited her doctor to seek treatment for a bullet wound. while he was treating the wound, the doctor asked the defendant how she was shot. the defendant replied that she was struck by a police officer’s bullet while running away from a jewelry store she had robbed, but she implored the doctor not to tell this to anyone. the doctor promised that he would not. although the defendant was never charged by the police, the owner of the jewelry store brought suit against her seeking the value of the stolen goods. the defendant denied robbing the store. at the trial, the owner calls the doctor to testify to the statement made to him by the defendant. the defense attorney objects on the ground that such testimony is barred by the jurisdiction’s physician-patient privilege. should the objection be sustained?

Athief was passing by a house under construction when he noticed that the ladder being used by workers on the roof had copper braces supporting the rungs. after making sure that the workers on the roof could not see him, the thief used pliers that he had in his pocket to remove all of the copper braces that he could reach from the ground. a short time later, a worker climbed down the ladder and it collapsed. he fell to the ground and severely injured his back. the thief was apprehended a few hours later trying to sell the copper for scrap. a statute in the jurisdiction makes it a felony for "maliciously causing serious physical injury to another." the thief was charged with malicious injury under the statute and was also charged with larceny. after a jury trial in which the above facts were presented, he was convicted of both charges. if he appeals the conviction for the malicious injury charge on grounds of insufficient evidence, how should the court rule? a affirm the conviction, because the thief was engaged in criminal conduct at the time of the act that resulted in the injury. b affirm the conviction, because the jury could have found that the thief acted with malice. c reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief intended to injure anyone. d reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief bore any malice towards the workers on the roof.

How did ellis island and angel island play a significant role in the late 1800s