Thoroughly explain how I argue that Relativism is barley a step up from Subjectivism, which is itself barley a step up from Nihilism, and ultimately how this renders Relativism useless as a moral theory. (To do this you will also need to thoroughly explain Relativism, and at least briefly explain Subjectivism and Nihilism. The subject is Philosophy, and I would be extremely grateful for a real, well written answer to the question, going for a 100 points my friends.

Considering "civil disobedience," which best describes how thoreau and martin luther king, jr. both felt about acts of civil disobedience? a. they both believed that acts of peaceful political protest would not affect or alter the law.b. they both believed that people should go against certain laws because government is a flawed concept.c. they both believed that individuals have the right and the responsibility to protest unjust laws.d. they both believed that breaking the law is an unjust action that deserves punishment.answer is c.