Discuss and distinguish the three different, nonscientific ways of learning about the world around you . Share examples of each from your own experiences and discuss one to two limitations related to learning about the world in this way.

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

The three different, nonscientific ways of learning about the world around you could be the following: experience, common sense, family oral traditions.

My examples are the following.

Experience. I think this is the best way to learn about real-life issues. You can read books, listen to teachers at school, but to truly learn you need to live, to experience. There is nothing like this. Theory can teach you up to a limit, but when you live it, you understand causes, decisions, and consequences.

Common sense. You logically think about what is the common thing to decide or do in any given situation. For example, what to do when someone is lying on the floor, you immediately ask for help or call 911.

Family oral traditions are what mom, dad, grandpa, and grandma teach you since you are a child

The limitations of these nonscientific ways of learning about the world around you are that not everybody has the same background, culture, traditions, and belief systems; which means everybody has different criteria of what is good or bad for them.

debating and finalizing the detail of the policy