subject
Social Studies, 23.02.2021 20:20 Cutiepie55561

bonjour pouvais vous m'aider a expliquer cette. citation je suis en terminale "Il ne s'agit pas d'interdire la technologie. Il s'agit de réaliser que sans la capacité de se concentrer, nous sommes des proies faciles pour le détournement de notre autonomie". merci davance la reponse. doit faite 20 lignes​

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 21.06.2019 18:30
This question is based on the following paragraph. tomas tiptoed across the room. he made sure not to walk on the spot that always creaked. he opened the squeaky door as slowly as possible. he took one last look in the crib and smiled. was anything more beautiful than a sleeping baby? softly he closed the nursery door and headed down the hall. it had been a long night. what can you infer from this paragraph? a. tomas was ready to start a new day. b. tomas's house needed some repairs. c. tomas had spent a long time getting his child to sleep. d. tomas did not enjoy being a father.
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 07:50
Aplaintiff filed a civil action based on negligence against a defendant in federal district court, alleging that the defendant negligently ran a red light at an intersection and collided with the plaintiff's vehicle, causing the plaintiff's injuries. a week after the close of discovery, the plaintiff filed a motion for summary judgment on the issue of whether the defendant was negligent. with the motion, the plaintiff filed (i) his own sworn affidavit, which stated that the traffic signal was green as he entered the intersection, (ii) an affidavit of a witness who was driving the car behind him, which stated that the witness saw the entire incident and that the plaintiff's traffic signal was green as he approached and entered the intersection; and (iii) an affidavit of another witness, which stated that she saw the entire incident and that the defendant's signal had been red for several seconds before the defendant entered the intersection and was still red when the defendant entered the intersection. the defendant filed a response to the motion, noting that her answer denied negligence and further denied that her traffic signal was red, and argued that the issue of negligence and the issue of whether her traffic signal was red were in dispute, so those issues should be tried to a jury. how should the court rule on the plaintiff's motion?
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 08:00
How did presidential reconstruction allow black codes to be passed
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 12:00
Does (flavius) josephus believe the romans were merciful when they conquered people? how does he try to persuade the reader to support his belief?
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
bonjour pouvais vous m'aider a expliquer cette. citation je suis en terminale "Il ne s'agit pas d'in...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 20.03.2020 09:53
question
Mathematics, 20.03.2020 09:53
question
Mathematics, 20.03.2020 09:53
question
Mathematics, 20.03.2020 09:53
Questions on the website: 13722363