Explain how the bourbon triumvirate henry grady and the interational cotton exposition shaped georgia

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Although there are no options attached, we can say the following.

The bourbon triumvirate and the international cotton exposition shaped Georgia in the following way.

The name Bourbon Triumvirate was given to the three most important and influential politicians in the state of Georgia after the period known as the Reconstruction, after the American Civil War. They were Joseph E. Brown, Alfred H. Colquitt, and John B. Gordon.

Colquitt as governor of the state and BRown and Gordon as Senators supported and impulse legislation and political decision that benefited farmers in Georgia and welcomed new industries to the state that generated many jobs and opportunities for the people.

Regarding the Expositions, the state of Georgia hosted the International Cotton Expositions in 1881, 1887, and 1897. Thousands of visitors enjoyed the expositions and could see samples of cotton grown in Georgia and other agriculture equipment and production methods to grow crops used in Georgia's cotton textile industry. These expositions were a big promotion tool that generated considerable investments in the state.

if interdependence implies a two-way dependence, and if each partner is equally dependent on the other for success, then there is an equal commitment to the making the partnership successful. the advantage is sustainability of the relationship, the disadvantage is that decisions are "democratic" and therefore may take longer to reach and more likely to be a compromise (which is not always the best solution). as the interdependence moves away from equality, the decisions become more influenced by the more independent partner. in the extreme the relationship becomes more dictatorial and more like "master-slave". generally the relationship has less commitment in both directions and is more likely to be temporary.

if one generalizes (and one shouldn't), equity partnerships, which is probably what is implied by interdependence, can be slow to progress or change but durable. the extreme alternative, independent-dependent partnerships tend to be efficient but more fragile.

hope this but you will have to site your own evidence. : )

the correct answer is option c. elenita versus "early puerto rican decor" is the best example, out of all the options, of a cultural conflict. a cultural conflict is defined as what happens when different cultures, that have different values and believes, clash. elenita not liking or accepting the puerto rican style of decoration, would represent that she does not identify herself with the puerto rican culture, therefore does not want to have decorations influenced by that culture.