1. Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson are two very disputed figures I’m history. Supporters of Hamilton see him as a foward-looking visionary who opened the way for American capitalism; opponents see him as supporting an all-powerful national government that unfairly of individual liberty and Libertarian ideas; opponents see him as impractical utopian dreamer who stubbornly cling to an agricultural future which of these view do you find most convincing? Were Hamilton and Jefferson completely incompatible or is it possible to see both men as equally integral to the young republic?

It was very possible that both men were needed for our government and our country to be this way today. Both Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton had opposing views on how this nation should be run. They never agreed on anything, but their different views helped shape the nation. So, yes. I still find Hamilton's view on the matter about how things should be run better and i agree with him more than Jefferson. And they were both essential for the republic.

Explanation:

marginal cost is a microeconomic measure that us to evaluate the extent to which the level of production of a good is sustainable in accounting, that is, to how many quantities the company plans to profit from the production of the good.

the concept of marginal cost is simple, it means the cost of producing one more item. for example, in the case of pies, the marginal cost is the cost of producing one more pie than those that have already been produced.

it is important to understand that productive activity influences marginal cost. the marginal cost of some goods can be very high, while others may be insignificant. for example, the marginal cost of producing an extra plane is very high. already the marginal cost of a water company to provide 1l more water is derisory.

in the case of pies, the cost involves the inputs, the labor and the fixed cost, which involves the fixed space of the bakery. the level of production initially has the marginal cost decreasing because there is space and manpower available. however, to produce more you have to hire more workers and buy more inputs. if physical space is limited, workers will conflict with places, inputs and their productivity will decrease, meaning there is an optimum point of production for each level of space and manpower. from this point on, the productivity of the workers will be getting smaller because of lack of space, so that the marginal cost of producing one more pie will be increasing. so, although you have not posted the chart, but if you have the answer, you can see that my explanation goes according to the marginal cost curve that will increase from the 4th pie, answer (c).