In Worcester v. Georgia (1832), the state of Georgia wanted to remove Cherokees from within its borders and began to annex Cherokee land. How did the Court rule? A.
Only the federal government had the authority to deal with the Cherokees and the Georgia laws dealing with them were unconstitutional.
B.
The Georgia laws in the case were upheld as constitutional.
C.
The federal government and the state of Georgia both had the authority to deal with the Cherokees.
D.
The state of Georgia did not have the authority to deal with the Cherokees; the true authority belonged to the state of Alabama.

Please select the best answer from the choices provided

A
B
C
D

QUESTION:♡

In Worcester v. Georgia (1832), the state of Georgia wanted to remove Cherokees from within its borders and began to annex Cherokee land. How did the Court rule♡

ANSWER:♡

B.

The Georgia laws in the case were upheld as constitutional♡

EXPLANATION:♡

HOPE IT HELP♡

DON'T REPORT ME THANK YOU ♡

abraham lincoln issued the preliminary emancipation proclamation on september 22nd, 1862. it stipulated that if the southern states did not cease their rebellion by january 1st, 1863, then proclamation would go into effect.

apart from being against desegregation, governor of georgia eugene talmadge opposed as well to the work progress administration, an ambitious program of the "new deal" created by president franklin d. roosevelt to overcome the great depression after world war i. talmadge disagreed with welfare spending, job training and organized labor. according to his ideas, he thought the government was spending too much money on this, and he wasn't willing to accept a wage higher than georgia's lower average wage. besides, talmadge strongly opposed to the "new deal" as he thought it had communist ideas.