subject
Social Studies, 22.01.2021 21:40 parisaidan366

Need help if the answer is right you get brainliest.


Need help if the answer is right you get brainliest.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 13:00
Awoman was found strangled in the basement of her home where she lived with her husband. the crime scene was processed and investigators left. the next day, the medical examiner reported that a scalloped, woven belt was used to strangle the victim. the police asked the husband to search the house again to look for such a belt and he agreed. a belt was found that matched marks on the victim. the man was arrested. his attorney made a motion that the belt be excluded from the evidence as he contended that the search was not legal. which statement is true? a. the belt should be excluded because the search was not legal. the police did not obtain a search warrant, as needed according to the fourth amendment to the u.s. constitution. b. the belt is admissible because the man gave his consent to the second search. c. the belt should be excluded because the search was not legal. the police did not obtain a search warrant, as need according to michigan v. tyler. d. the belt is admissible as evidence, according to mincey v. arizona.
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 18:30
In which type of economy are these decisions made by the producers , consumers, and the goverment?
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 04:50
Fallon is on her way to work when she sees a little boy, who is crying and apparently lost. seeing the crying boy makes fallon very uncomfortable and upset. to reduce these negative feelings, fallon stops to the boy find his parents. which theory best explains fallon's behavior?
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 09:30
Donald was arrested for murdering an acquaintance. at the trial, donald takes the stand and testifies that he and the victim knew each other. he admits that they would drink and use drugs together. one night while partying, donald explains in his testimony, an argument got out of hand during a card game. donald explains that the victim accused him of cheating and pulled out a knife on him and started swinging it in the air. donald said that he had no choice but to pull out his gun and shoot the victim. the jury convicted donald of manslaughter. who would argue that donald weighed the potential costs and benefits of shooting the victim and decided to pull the trigger as a result of free will? a. a rational choice theorist b. a critical criminologist c. a conflict theorist d. a positivist
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
Need help if the answer is right you get brainliest.
...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 11.01.2020 02:31
Questions on the website: 13722360