What is the best reason for a writer to include opponents counterclaims in an argumentative essay? A) to explain why opposing viewpoints are wrong.
B) to add extra pieces of evidence to an argument.
C) to show why opposing viewpoints have no support.
D) to expand the number of arguments about the topic.

A

Explanation:

the counterclaims can be wrong and most time are wrong

(btw this question is in the wrong category)  

the historians cited in the article all agree with one another about the cause of the civil war. despite coming from different backgrounds and cultures, the historians agree that slavery was the root cause of the civil war. the fact that all these historiansgenerally agree with one another makes their shared viewpoints more reliable and valid, especially because the historians have different backgrounds and all work for the well-respected institutions of howard university, clemson university, and the university of colorado.

explanation:

allergens: overstimulate the nerve system

neurotics: attack nerve cells

mutagens: damage or otherwise alter dna sequence

generators: cause defects during growth and development  

carcinogens: cause unchecked cell growth

i hope you get the idea according to me these are the effects that happened.