Overall, were the economic effects of the Civil War positive or negative?

Negative, but not by much.

Explanation:

During the civil war both Northern and Southern states in USA had to pay a lot of expenditures for the military's wages , equipment's, and supplies. On top of that, it caused the loss of a lot of labor forces in north and Sothern states.

But after the civil war was won, the southern states no longer able to use slaves. So, the plantations start using technologies from the industrial revolution that make the production actually become more efficient. This almost made up for the lost that incurred from the war in term of GDP.

Here is another response.

Explanation:

Some positive outcomes from the Civil War was the newfound freedom of slaves and the improvement in women's reform. Some negative outcomes from the Civil War was the South's loss of land and crop from the devastated land left behind and the South's hold on to racism.

have a good day humans :D

the answer is: c. c.it limited the president’s power to start wars.

the war powers resolution of 1973 requires the president to notify the congress whenever the president wanted to order a military operation to other countries within 48 hours. if after being reviewed the congress disagree with the proposal, that the president will be banned from ordering the operation.

the answer is the petition of right.

explanation:

offer to of right, real demand of attesting a benefit against the english crown, the most remarkable point of reference being the petition of right of 1628, which parliament sent to charles i fussing of a movement of oversteps of law. the term also implied the framework (invalidated in 1947) by which a subject could sue the crown.   taking a gander at the frameworks used by maria amidu to make a standard in 2015 commending the 1628 petition of right, which was sent to charles i by the english parliament. at uniquely based law the crown, or the sovereign in his official cutoff, couldn't be sued in the ruler's courts. since the ruler was, really, the superior ace of those courts, coordinating value in them between his subjects, he was not subject to their ward. therefore it transformed into a preparation, at whatever point a subject's certified or individual property had come into the responsibility for ruler or his specialists without legitimate perfect, for the subject to engage the master in chamber for its recovery.