Gregory is the owner to clothing stores he sells a variety of styles of clothing but in general he believes I have included what college logos at his store will help people feel more school spirit is proposing an experimental study to examine this belief.

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

There is no question here. It is just a statement.

Trying to help you we can add the following comment.

Because Gregory is the owner of clothing stores, he sells a variety of styles of clothing,  with college logos that make students proud of their school and athletic teams. If he is proposing an experimental study to examine this belief that clothing with the college logo would help people feel more school spirit, he has to establish the number of students that are going to be part of the study. Once limiting the number, he has to draft the questions of the survey and include close and open questions.  

Gregory has to show quantitative and qualitative data that demonstrates that his theory is correct, elaborate a report with the statistics and graphics to show it to the school principal.

If he convinces the school authorities, he could sell his clothes with the school logo to make a good profit and foster the school spirit.

the answer is the petition of right.

explanation:

offer to of right, real demand of attesting a benefit against the english crown, the most remarkable point of reference being the petition of right of 1628, which parliament sent to charles i fussing of a movement of oversteps of law. the term also implied the framework (invalidated in 1947) by which a subject could sue the crown.   taking a gander at the frameworks used by maria amidu to make a standard in 2015 commending the 1628 petition of right, which was sent to charles i by the english parliament. at uniquely based law the crown, or the sovereign in his official cutoff, couldn't be sued in the ruler's courts. since the ruler was, really, the superior ace of those courts, coordinating value in them between his subjects, he was not subject to their ward. therefore it transformed into a preparation, at whatever point a subject's certified or individual property had come into the responsibility for ruler or his specialists without legitimate perfect, for the subject to engage the master in chamber for its recovery.