subject
Social Studies, 05.01.2021 16:00 ekids22

The bill for blocking up the harbor of Boston is replete [filled] with injustice and cruelty, thousands of innocent men, besides women and infants, are by it reduced to indigence [poverty] and distress; and though we in this town more immediately feel this distress, yet our brethren [brothers] in other towns of this province, and all the other colonies, must see that we suffer in the common cause, and that they themselves must soon realize the sufferings under which we now labour, if no means are discovered for our relief. But if any should think that this town alone is to groan under the weight of arbitrary [unfair] power, we are now furnished [provided] by our enemies with a still more glaring [obvious] evidence of a fixed plan of the British administration to bring the whole continent into the most humiliating bondage. Using Source 3, what was the primary goal of the Committees of Correspondence?

A. To persuade Parliament to repeal the taxes imposed on the colonists.

B. To convince colonists to support the Stamp Act.

C. To have communication between the colonies.

D. To persuade colonists to ratify the constitution.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 21.06.2019 15:10
How does monetary policy impact the nation’s economy?
Answers: 3
question
Social Studies, 21.06.2019 21:30
A. in weeks v. united states (1914), the court established the exclusionary rule, which was incorporated to the states in mapp v. ohio (1961), and the court established the concept of a "good faith exception" to the exclusionary rule in united states v. leon (1984). in their opinion, the supreme court pointed out that compliance with the exclusionary rule can have a cost to society (criminals can go free) that outweighs the benefits (stopping illegal searches by police). ultimately, the court determined that despite the exclusionary rule, evidence can still be admitted in situations where police made genuine "good faith" efforts to act legally, but technically acted illegally, in obtaining the evidence. explain the exclusionary rule good faith exception and explain and support whether you agree or disagree with the concept of a good faith exception to the exclusionary rule? why or why not? use the lesson notes and/or one news source to support your answer.
Answers: 3
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 11:40
Hypothetically speaking, you are assigned to a committee of three to decide on a dress code for campbellsville university staff and faculty. only two of the three votes are required to pass this policy. in this situation you are one of the two agreeing to a dress code. what steps might you take to gain the cooperation of the third party after the policy has been initiated.
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 17:00
Earlier studies were more slanted toward a. the upper class. c. caucasian males. b. teenagers in school. d. caucasian females. select the best answer from the choices provided a b c d
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
The bill for blocking up the harbor of Boston is replete [filled] with injustice and cruelty, thousa...
Questions
Questions on the website: 13722361