Which statement reflects thomas gibbons’s view of interstate commerce? -state and federal governments should jointly negotiate interstate commerce. -the federal government should have power over interstate commerce. -individual operators should negotiate interstate commerce. -state governments have power over interstate commerce.

The federal government should have power over interstate commerce.

Thomas Gibbons was a planter, politician , lawyer and steamboat owner. He was the plaintiff in the case Gibbons vs. Ogden (1824). In this case, Gibbons's lawyer argued that the federal government should have power over interstate commerce. The Supreme Court argued in favor of Gibbons.

its b i googled it wish u luck

the answer is the petition of right.

explanation:

offer to of right, real demand of attesting a benefit against the english crown, the most remarkable point of reference being the petition of right of 1628, which parliament sent to charles i fussing of a movement of oversteps of law. the term also implied the framework (invalidated in 1947) by which a subject could sue the crown.   taking a gander at the frameworks used by maria amidu to make a standard in 2015 commending the 1628 petition of right, which was sent to charles i by the english parliament. at uniquely based law the crown, or the sovereign in his official cutoff, couldn't be sued in the ruler's courts. since the ruler was, really, the superior ace of those courts, coordinating value in them between his subjects, he was not subject to their ward. therefore it transformed into a preparation, at whatever point a subject's certified or individual property had come into the responsibility for ruler or his specialists without legitimate perfect, for the subject to engage the master in chamber for its recovery.