When fights broke out between Chinese and Indian security forces, many outside observers grew concerned because both states are nuclear powers. They were especially concerned that the dissuading states from using nuclear weapons would be insufficient to constrain them. a) regulative norm
b) nuclear nonproliferation treaty
c) Universal Declaration of Human Rights
d) standard operating procedure

b) nuclear nonproliferation treaty

Explanation:

Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty is a treaty involving all the nations particularly those in possession of nuclear weapons. This international treaty seeks to regulate the distribution of nuclear weapons and weapons creation.

The purpose of which is to facilitate mutual understanding and alliance in the nonviolent utilization of nuclear energy, and again improve the objective of attaining nuclear and general disarmament.

Hence, in this case, the correct answer is "Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty."

the answer is the petition of right.

explanation:

offer to of right, real demand of attesting a benefit against the english crown, the most remarkable point of reference being the petition of right of 1628, which parliament sent to charles i fussing of a movement of oversteps of law. the term also implied the framework (invalidated in 1947) by which a subject could sue the crown.   taking a gander at the frameworks used by maria amidu to make a standard in 2015 commending the 1628 petition of right, which was sent to charles i by the english parliament. at uniquely based law the crown, or the sovereign in his official cutoff, couldn't be sued in the ruler's courts. since the ruler was, really, the superior ace of those courts, coordinating value in them between his subjects, he was not subject to their ward. therefore it transformed into a preparation, at whatever point a subject's certified or individual property had come into the responsibility for ruler or his specialists without legitimate perfect, for the subject to engage the master in chamber for its recovery.