How can the province having more agricultural land contribute for the development

Explanation:

Agriculture sector, contributing to more than one third of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) and employing two-thirds of the country's labour force is central to the livelihood of every Nepalese people. The agriculture sector is pivotal to increase income, alleviate poverty and uplift the living standard of the Nepalese people. However, the performance of this sector has been inadequate to meet the increasing food demand and livelihood needs of growing population in the country. In the context of the recent global and national food crisis, recent unprecedented rise of the price of foods, the role of agriculture remains in mitigating food crisis, etc. The aim of agricultural based least developed countries lies in reducing poverty and resolving economic woes. This paper is the outcome of recent research works conducted in Nepal. It aims to present contribution of the agriculture sector to ensuring food security, enhancing economic growth, and reducing poverty based on the review and analysis of the recent data and information. It provides the current situation of poverty, development gaps, livelihood and food security, food supply and balance, etc. Challenges lied towards integrating trade of agriculture products including providing opportunities for food production and distribution that helps to mitigate food insecurity, reducing poverty, and resolving economic crisis in the country. Finally, the paper suggests measure to take appropriate actions and future strategic directions for improving the performance of the agricultural sector to ensure national food security, spur economic growth, and reduce poverty aimed towards the development and creation of a just, new and a prosperous Nepal. Keywords: agriculture development, agriculture growth, poverty reduction, food security

hope it helps

pls follow me

as university of miami psychologists debra lieberman and adam smith pointed out in a recent article in the journal current directions in psychological science, humans have social and psychological mechanisms to deter incest. with very few exceptions, marriages between brothers and sisters and between parents and their children are verboten in every human culture. the primary psychological anti-incest mechanism is the yuck response. even the idea of sex with their mom or dad, bro or sis is upsetting to most people. the psychologist jonathan haidt has found that nearly everyone is repelled by the prospect of brother-sister sex, even in hypothetical situations in which there is no chance of pregnancy).

the biological cost of incest

this raises an interesting question: just what’s so bad about incest? sure, having sex with your dad or your sister seems gross — but why? some anthropologists have argued that incest taboos are learned social conventions. this explanation, however, doesn’t make sense to me as it does not explain the widespread existence of anti-incest mechanisms in creatures ranging from cockroaches to chimpanzees. second, the incest taboo is about as close to a universal law as human moral rules get.

why should mechanisms to avoid incest be so widespread both in nature and across human societies? the answer is simple. the problem with having sex close with relatives is that there is an astonishingly high chance that your offspring will be born with a serious birth defect.

the above statement/question is (true);