subject
Social Studies, 18.12.2020 16:40 homeschool0123

help meh pleasee thanks i just need this one i've been stuck on it for a bit tried googling it but that didn't help so please help


help meh pleasee thanks i just need this one i've been stuck on it for a bit tried googling it but

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 11:00
This form of government has only a single political party. question 2 options: communist democratic autocratic parliamentary
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 17:30
The platt amendment of 1901 forbade cuba from entering into any treaties that would allow undue foreign involvement in cuban affairs. this law was passed after the spanish-american war to make sure that european nations weren’t going to get involved with cuba. 1, why might the platt amendment be considered ironic? 2, what reasons would the united states have for not wanting european influence in cuba?
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 18:30
Recently, there has been pressure to loosen clean air standards. use economic arguments to support or oppose this proposed action.
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 06:00
Ahusband who believed that his wife was having an affair with his brother hired an arsonist to burn down the brother's house. they planned for the husband to take his brother to a ballgame so that the arsonist would be able to set the house on fire without detection. after the husband and brother left for the ballgame, however, the arsonist decided to abandon the plan and immediately left town without doing anything further. when the husband returned from the ballgame with the brother, he saw the house still standing and blurted out what was supposed to have happened. the husband and the arsonist were arrested and charged with conspiracy to commit arson. at the arsonist's trial, his attorney argued that he was innocent of the conspiracy because he decided not to go ahead with the plan, and nothing criminal had in fact occurred.at common law, how should a jury find the arsonist? a not guilty of conspiracy, because going to a ballgame is not a criminal overt act.b not guilty of conspiracy, because the husband, not the arsonist, committed the overt act.c guilty, because the husband executed his part of the plan.d guilty, because the arsonist agreed to set the brother's house on fire.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
help meh pleasee thanks i just need this one i've been stuck on it for a bit tried googling it but t...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 17.03.2020 02:19
Questions on the website: 13722359