Social Studies, 17.12.2020 23:50 renee9913

Read: “Our great rule of conduct towards foreign nations is to expand our trade relations so that we have as few political ties with them as possible. As much as we have already formed commitments, let us fulfill them, with perfect good faith. And let's stick with it. Europe has a set of primordial interests, which with us have no relation, or even very distant. Consequently, it is engaged in frequent controversies, the causes of which are essentially foreign to our concerns. Therefore, it is unwise for us to get involved, because of artificial ties, in the ordinary vicissitudes of its politics, or the ordinary combinations and conflicts of its friendships or enmities.
[...] Why give up the advantages of such a special situation? Why leave our own soil to stand in a foreign land? Why, by interweaving our destiny with that of any part of Europe, entangle our peace and prosperity in the labors of European ambitions, rivalries, interests, moods or whims?
It is our true policy to move forward free from Permanent Alliances with any part of the Foreign World - As far, I mean, as we are now able to do - do not believe me capable of recommending to be unfaithful to existing commitments, (I support the maxim no less applicable to public than private affairs, that honesty is always the best policy) - So I repeat, continue to apply these commitments in their true sense. But in my opinion, it is unnecessary and would be unwise to extend them. "

Q: What commitment is the author talking about in the last two sentences

Answers: 1

Show answers

Another question on Social Studies

Social Studies, 21.06.2019 23:00

What does this quotation from the introduction of thedeclaration of independence do?

Answers: 1

Answer

Social Studies, 23.06.2019 03:30

What two emerging factors after the war of 1812 contributed to the development of sctionalism

Answers: 1

Answer

Social Studies, 23.06.2019 05:30

Athief was passing by a house under construction when he noticed that the ladder being used by workers on the roof had copper braces supporting the rungs. after making sure that the workers on the roof could not see him, the thief used pliers that he had in his pocket to remove all of the copper braces that he could reach from the ground. a short time later, a worker climbed down the ladder and it collapsed. he fell to the ground and severely injured his back. the thief was apprehended a few hours later trying to sell the copper for scrap. a statute in the jurisdiction makes it a felony for "maliciously causing serious physical injury to another." the thief was charged with malicious injury under the statute and was also charged with larceny. after a jury trial in which the above facts were presented, he was convicted of both charges. if he appeals the conviction for the malicious injury charge on grounds of insufficient evidence, how should the court rule? a affirm the conviction, because the thief was engaged in criminal conduct at the time of the act that resulted in the injury. b affirm the conviction, because the jury could have found that the thief acted with malice. c reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief intended to injure anyone. d reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief bore any malice towards the workers on the roof.

Answers: 2

Answer

Social Studies, 23.06.2019 06:00

Which event was one of the greatest factors that led to massive emigration from ireland to the united states in the mid-1800s? a) world war i b) the civil war c) the irish potato famine d) colonization of the new world plz fastest and right answer gets 94 !

Answers: 2

Answer

You know the right answer?

Read: “Our great rule of conduct towards foreign nations is to expand our trade relations so that we...

Questions