subject
Social Studies, 17.12.2020 05:50 mamas12345

3. Que suggère Malala que les gens fassent pour protéger le droit à l'éducation?

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 21.06.2019 23:00
For each of the following, mark whether it is a possible confounder (a factor that mixes up the results, making it look like candy is to blame when it's a causal (or causation) link which supports the argument that candy causes criminal behavior (ie, explains how candy leads to criminality ), or neither (an irrelevant factor, something that may cause people to become criminals but has nothing to do with eating candy). choose your answers based only< on the information given. additives in candy- additives found in candy may adversely affect brain development of young children in ways that could contribute towards adult aggression. impulsive personality-- kids who are highly impulsive and have trouble delaying gratification are more likely to eat candy every day as children and more likely to disobey laws as adults. violent abuse-- children who suffer violent abuse are more likely to become violent adults and commit violent crimes. gender- boys are overwhelmingly more likely to commit violent crimes
Answers: 3
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 02:30
Telling your brain to slow down and focusing on details are crucial activities in which positive study habit?
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 18:40
Which statement is a good description of a model? a) models are a description of nature based only on one or two variables. b) models are testable ideas but they are not very to most people. c) models are a description of nature that predicts more accurately than real events. d) models are an approximiation of a real system that omits all but most essential variables in a system.
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 20:30
Supreme court. jim, who is a bit eccentric, says that he is fed up with the way a certain employer in his town treats employees and that he is going to sue that employer in an effort to improve matters. jim also says that he is going to start his case at the appellate court level, skipping over all those "lesser" judges. jim says that those justices will surely hear him out and that he will also seek a jury. although he is not a lawyer, jim believes that the offenses of the employer are so severe that the justices will appreciate his attempt to make things better for the employees involved. will jim get a jury at the appellate court level?
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
3. Que suggère Malala que les gens fassent pour protéger le droit à l'éducation?...
Questions
question
English, 29.08.2019 18:30
Questions on the website: 13722362