Situation- Imagine you are a Roman citizen. After reading about Julius Caesar, his rise to
power, decide whether you would have been for OR against Julius Ceasar's rise to power
and his reforms.
Task
In a well developed paragraph, state your claim whether you would be for or
against
Caesar, and offer 2 pieces of textual evidence (facts) from the textbook to support your
claim, AND explain how your evidence supports your claim
Write your response in the box below...
.be sure to include a claim, 2 reasons and explanations 40 points
write in complete sentences and use your best spelling and grammar 10 points

I would have been against Caesar concentration of powers.

Explanation:

Caesar was a very competent general and politician who conquered many territories for the Roman Republic, and led many transformations for public life. However, he was also a leader who tended to concentrate power for himself, and used his popularity to legitimize these actions.

The truth is that Caesar was the main factor that ended the Roman Republic and started the Roman Empire. His actions were the actions of a dictator, and he set the example for the ensuing rulers of the Roman Empire to become actual emperors or dictators.

there are indirect ways of affecting state laws   by with holding funding's. and that's why we have a 55mph speed on the high way with a design of 70mph speed.