subject
Social Studies, 15.12.2020 05:00 ashleypere99

Why does this difference make the action of South Carolina an “offense” that the federal government can punish “by the law of self-defense”?

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 02:00
Awife was having an affair with her neighbor. the wife and her husband had a prenuptial agreement that prevented the wife from receiving any of the husband’s sizable fortune in the event of a divorce. the wife and her neighbor formed a plan to murder the husband and run away together with the wife’s inheritance. the neighbor shot the husband one evening, killing him instantly, then drove to a town 100 miles away and checked into a motel. later that night, the police showed up at the motel with a valid warrant for the neighbor’s arrest. after the neighbor was arrested and placed in a police car, the police asked the motel clerk for permission to search the room, and the clerk granted the request. the police found the gun hidden in the tank of the toilet. the wife and the neighbor were each charged with first-degree murder and tried separately. at her trial, the wife sought to suppress any evidence of the gun, arguing that it was seized illegally. what is the prosecution’s strongest response to this argument? athe motel clerk gave the police permission to search the room. bthe wife was not staying in the motel room where the gun was found. cthe gun was found in a search incident to a lawful arrest. dthe neighbor did not have a reason
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 06:00
One of the results of the 2010 golf of mexico oil spill is the threat to various species in the goths ecosystem it disturbed and in some cases forever altered the of the gulf coast
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 06:20
How did the kansas-nebraska act contradict the missouri compromise?
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 14:30
Horton automatics and the industrial division of the communications workers of america, the union that represented horton’s workers, negotiated a collective bargaining agreement. if an employee’s discharge for a workplace-rule violation was submitted to arbitration, the agreement limited the arbitrator to determining whether the rule was reasonable and whether the employee had violated it. when horton discharged employee ruben de la garza, the union appealed to arbitration. the arbitrator found that de la garza had violated a reasonable safety rule, but “was not totally convinced” that horton should have treated the violation more seriously than other rule violations. the arbitrator ordered de la garza reinstated. can a court set aside this order
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
Why does this difference make the action of South Carolina an “offense” that the federal government...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 11.02.2020 01:58
question
World Languages, 11.02.2020 01:58
question
Biology, 11.02.2020 01:58
question
History, 11.02.2020 01:58
Questions on the website: 13722361