PLZ HELP ME PLZZZ IF YOU DO I GIVE YOU BRAINLIEST I DO ANYTHING JUST PLZ HELP Indians fought colonists who moved west. In 1763 Britain set the Proclamation Line and banned settlement west of it to avoid another war.

1. From a colonist’s perspective, why would this act/law
be viewed negatively?

2. According to Great Britain, how does the new act/law
benefit the colonies? How does it benefit Great Britain?

1. Worst of all, the British now began levying taxes against American colonists.  The British point of view is not difficult to grasp.  principles of the common law, and acts of Parliament, but from the British constitution. The Stamp Act was very unpopular among colonists. A majority considered it a violation of their rights as Englishmen to be taxed without their consent—consent that only the colonial legislatures could grant. Their slogan was "No taxation without representation"

2. In 1651, the British Parliament, in the first of what became known as the Navigation Acts, declared that only English ships would be allowed to bring goods into England, and that the North American colonies could only export its commodities, such as tobacco and sugar, to England.The English Navigation Acts, which were passed in the 17th and 18th centuries, restricted foreign trade by England's colonies. In essence, the Acts forced colonial trade to favor England and prevented colonial trade with the Netherlands, France, and other European countries. Hope this helps you!

answer; i believe that the correct answer is ( rivers);

this null effect is caused by a weak manipulation and ineffective internal validity. in a scientific study, as the one dr. morimoto is trying to perfom, internal validity refers to the confidence placed in the cause-effect relationship and to how well an experiment is done and able to eliminate confounding variables.