Answers: 1
Social Studies, 21.06.2019 21:30
You are a member of the jury for a murder case. the prosecution has presented dna evidence linking the defendant to the crime scene. the defense claims that dna evidence using str analysis with 13 markers is not sufficient to reliably distinguish between people. what do you think? a. the defense is right. str analysis with 13 markers gives a 1 in 1 million chance of two people having the same pattern, leaving a reasonable doubt. b. str analysis is not sufficient. the defendant's entire genome should be sequenced. the prosecution will have to consult a genomic library to make sure their dna evidence is valid. c. the prosecution is right. str analysis with 13 markers gives a 1 in 10 billion or greater chance that two people will have the same pattern. this person was at the crime scene. d. dna evidence is not generally accepted by legal experts.
Answers: 1
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 03:00
Should domestic security cases be handled differently than other types crimes?
Answers: 1
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 03:30
What two emerging factors after the war of 1812 contributed to the development of sctionalism
Answers: 1
Why was the Townshend Acts repealed?...
Mathematics, 26.03.2020 23:00
Mathematics, 26.03.2020 23:00
Mathematics, 26.03.2020 23:00
Spanish, 26.03.2020 23:00
English, 26.03.2020 23:00
Mathematics, 26.03.2020 23:00
Biology, 26.03.2020 23:00
English, 26.03.2020 23:00
Mathematics, 26.03.2020 23:00
Mathematics, 26.03.2020 23:00