In which ways did Napoleon bring reform to France? Check all that apply. by appointing government officials based on merit by doing away with all religious practices by creating administrative districts to centralizing government by opening secondary schools to all males by instituting the Napoleonic Code by instituting a fairer tax system by allowing freedom of speech

by appointing government officials based on merit.

by creating administrative districts to centralizing government.

by instituting the Napoleonic Code.

by instituting a fairer tax system.

Explanation:

The French Revolution was a revolution that started on the 5th of May, 1789 and ended on the 9th of November, 1799 at the kingdom of France.

Basically, the revolution was centered around the decision made by the French citizens to redesign and restructure their political landscape and leadership styles and as such led to the abolishment of the feudal system (Ancien Regime) and absolute monarchy. Also, this revolution caused a lot of political turmoil and chaotic bloodbath leading to the death of King Louis XVI and his wife Marie Antoinette in the month of January, 1793.

Consequently, Napoleon Bonaparte ascended to power by becoming the first consul in the month of November, 1799.

The ways in which Napoleon brought reform to France are;

1. by appointing government officials based on merit.

2. by creating administrative districts to centralizing government.

3. by instituting the Napoleonic Code.

4. by instituting a fairer tax system.

panem is a communist totalitarian dictatorship where all the resources and how they are allocated belongs to the capitol. the districts exist only to provide goods and services for the capital and most of the citizens live in poverty. it is a police state where the "peacekeepers" use force and threats to keep the people under control. dissent is outlawed and those who disobey the law are executed, flogged, or turned into avoxes. the games are another means in which the ruling elite in the capitol exert their power over the districts. when reading the books i drew parallels between panem and the soviet union and north korea. in no way is panem capitalist. the people in the capitol are wealthy but the majority of them are involved in the government somehow. it was the same way in the former soviet union where bigwigs in the communist party and high ranking government officials were given access to goods, services, medical treatments not available to the general public. if you think panem has a capitalist economy you need to brush up on your economics.  

because the early people found out about it.