subject
Social Studies, 21.11.2020 04:50 gthif13211

The commander of the army, or thewould become more powerful and more important than the emperor of Japan
a. Samurai
b. Shogun
C. Kamakura
d. Daimyo

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 21.06.2019 20:40
Hurrry plzzz 16 pointsssss which major economic activity in the middle east occurs largely in the areas circled on the map above? a. coal mining b. farming c. nomadic herding d. oil production
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 01:40
Which of the following was not a part of the armistice between germany and the allies? a. germany had to agree to the terms of the treaty of brest-litovsk. b. germany had to surrender its entire submarine fleet to the allies. c. kaiser wilhelm ii had to give his throne. d. all german troops had to be withdrawn from the western front.
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 05:30
Athief was passing by a house under construction when he noticed that the ladder being used by workers on the roof had copper braces supporting the rungs. after making sure that the workers on the roof could not see him, the thief used pliers that he had in his pocket to remove all of the copper braces that he could reach from the ground. a short time later, a worker climbed down the ladder and it collapsed. he fell to the ground and severely injured his back. the thief was apprehended a few hours later trying to sell the copper for scrap. a statute in the jurisdiction makes it a felony for "maliciously causing serious physical injury to another." the thief was charged with malicious injury under the statute and was also charged with larceny. after a jury trial in which the above facts were presented, he was convicted of both charges. if he appeals the conviction for the malicious injury charge on grounds of insufficient evidence, how should the court rule? a affirm the conviction, because the thief was engaged in criminal conduct at the time of the act that resulted in the injury. b affirm the conviction, because the jury could have found that the thief acted with malice. c reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief intended to injure anyone. d reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief bore any malice towards the workers on the roof.
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 07:30
Recall that in one condition of the experiment conducted by stasser and titus (1985) about student council president candidates, all group members had access to the same information, and that in another condition, members had unique information that other group members didn't know. in the second (unshared information) condition, the group made a worse decision than in the first (shared information) condition. this occurred because groups seldom can agree on who is most expert. focus discussion on the information that all members know. often ignore dissenting opinions. avoid differences of opinion, given conformity pressures.
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
The commander of the army, or thewould become more powerful and more important than the emperor of...
Questions
question
Chemistry, 28.08.2019 22:50
question
English, 28.08.2019 22:50
question
Geography, 28.08.2019 22:50
Questions on the website: 13722361