Agroup of city residents would like a new park in their neighborhood. they submit a signed petition to city hall. the city agrees that a park should be built, and a city planner identifies a suitable location for the park. the location, however, is an overgrown, abandoned lot with a building that is clearly a hazard. any other location is too far away to suit the needs of the citizens who petitioned.

what should the city do next?

begin construction of the park's playground on the abandoned lot
find the owner of the building and fine him for causing a hazard
find out who owns the land and offer to purchase the property
condemn the building to eliminate the hazard and clear the land

The answer is C, The reason being is that the first answer does not resolve the problem of which there is a caution, the second answer would most likely cause a dispute between the owner of the house and the city which could lead to the owner sueing the city for submitting a fine to him or her, the third answer could allow the person to accept the offer and take the money and go live somewhere else, The fourth answer would most likely cause the same problem as the third answer did. So, in conclusion the answer is C.

i am confused, what is the question? i can you out if you put it into more depth.

whitch constitution would be inadequate as a basis for government today?

the answer would be a) it only allowed catholics to be in government.