Social Studies, 09.11.2020 22:20 savannahvargas512

Article 9th: The United States of America engage to put an end immediately after the Ratification of the present Treaty to hostilities with all the Tribes or Nations of Indians with whom they may be at war at the time of such Ratification, and forthwith to restore to such Tribes or Nations respectively all the possessions, rights, and privileges which they may have enjoyed or been entitled to in one thousand eight hundred and eleven previous to such hostilities. Provided always that such Tribes or Nations shall agree to desist from all hostilities against the United States of America, their Citizens, and Subjects upon the Ratification of the present Treaty being notified to such Tribes or Nations, and shall so desist accordingly. And His Britannic Majesty engages on his part to put an end immediately after the Ratification of the present Treaty to hostilities with all the Tribes or Nations of Indians with whom He may be at war at the time of such Ratification, and forthwith to restore to such Tribes or Nations respectively all the possessions, rights, and privileges, which they may have enjoyed or been entitled to in one thousand eight hundred and eleven previous to such hostilities. Provided always that such Tribes or Nations shall agree to desist from all hostilities against His Britannic Majesty and His Subjects upon the Ratification of the present Treaty being notified to such Tribes or Nations, and shall so desist accordingly.

–from the Treaty of Ghent, 1814

Article 10th:

Whereas the Traffic in Slaves is irreconcilable with the principles of humanity and Justice, and whereas both His Majesty and the United States are desirous of continuing their efforts to promote its entire abolition, it is hereby agreed that both the contracting parties shall use their best endeavours to accomplish so desirable an object.

-from the Treaty of Ghent, 1814

Which central idea do these two passages have in common?

They both tell why slavery is an unjust practice that should end.
They both explain how the United States will work to stop something.
They both identify all the parties involved in the signing of the agreement.
They both describe how the war between the US and the tribes will be resolved.

Answers: 2

Show answers

Another question on Social Studies

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 20:30

Supreme court. jim, who is a bit eccentric, says that he is fed up with the way a certain employer in his town treats employees and that he is going to sue that employer in an effort to improve matters. jim also says that he is going to start his case at the appellate court level, skipping over all those "lesser" judges. jim says that those justices will surely hear him out and that he will also seek a jury. although he is not a lawyer, jim believes that the offenses of the employer are so severe that the justices will appreciate his attempt to make things better for the employees involved. will jim get a jury at the appellate court level?

Answers: 2

Answer

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 22:30

Many of these mythological stories were filled with violence. why do you think this is?

Answers: 1

Answer

Social Studies, 23.06.2019 05:00

What obstacles did jen bricker face early in life?

Answers: 2

Answer

Social Studies, 23.06.2019 05:30

The graphic organizer includes facts about germany and japan. a student created this organizer for a document-based essay on the expansion of totalitarian states. which fact could be added to column a? results of german elections in the 1930s employment statistics in nazi germany germany’s invasions of poland and france a list of domestic laws passed in germany

Answers: 1

Answer

You know the right answer?

Article 9th: The United States of America engage to put an end immediately after the Ratification o...

Questions