Which of the following best explains why the game of economics is about setting goals as much as it is about making allocation decisions a. there are different and incompatible economic goals (b.) making allocation decisions requires information and resources (c.) consumers need goals in order to know what goods and services to buy (d.) it's unnecessary to have a goal to make allocation decisions

The other answer's wrong, it's A. There are different and incompatible economic goals.

abu bakr, was a senior companion and—through his daughter aisha—a father-in-law of the islamic prophet muhammad. abu bakr became the first openly declared muslim outside muhammad's family. abu bakr served as a trusted advisor to muhammad.

hello,

your answer is ready

i believe its either the first or third option but i'm leaning more towards the third option:

the first excerpt makes a logical appeal, while the second excerpt makes an emotional appeal.

your pal

~papaguy