which candidate was more effective at convetying his/her point for each of the topics during the debate? did you learn anything new from either of the candidates? in your opinion, did one candidate clearly do better than the other? explain, citing specific examples from your chart and debate.

The issue of systemic racism has come up in earlier debates as Ernst has argued that because Greenfield has professed her belief in systemic racism, the Democrat is saying police are racist. Ernst repeated that claim during Thursday’s debate.

Ernst said she doesn’t believe there is systematic racism in police departments, though she added that certain people are racist and the country has opportunities to do better.

“I believe that there are many challenges that we have in various systems but I would not say just broadly that we have systemic racism across the board,” Ernst said. “Certainly we have good people that are working in all career fields and I think it’s important to stress that.”

Ernest kept blaming greenfield that about her believing police are racist, calling it “insulting” and noting her father-in-law was in law enforcement. However, Greenfield said systemic racism has long been a problem in many U.S. institutions, including policing. without any clear proof

im not fully sure but the debate against racism could have been more fuller like more evidence like there reasons were dull to prove there side of there belief

Explanation:

comment if u need more

c is the answer for this

the secretary of state, appointed by the president with the advice and consent of the senate, is the president's chief foreign affairs adviser. the secretary carries out the president's foreign policies through the state department and the foreign service of the united states.