Which best describes the March to the Sea? It was a tactic that ultimately wasted Northern resources.
It was a destructive tactic that made the war last longer.
It was a destructive tactic that helped end the war.
It was a tactic that showed the North's good intentions. What is the answer

there are conflicting perceptions. what cannot be denied is that despite a long history of discrimination, they finally chose to bow out in grace and handed over power to the majority. it was a painful experience for them to part with their prerogatives and some chose to leave the country. however, they did decide to bite the bullet and go through the process with minimum obstructions.

presently, whites are still a force to reckon with. they are well educated, have technical and business expertise, they understand imperatives of good governance and are responsible for keeping south africa connected with developed countries. despite a bitter history, they are useful team members of the south african team.

well this isn't a question but if you are asking if it is true or false it is, true.

answer; informational social influence;