subject
Social Studies, 20.10.2020 03:01 KittyLitty

Based on the part of the letter that you just read, what can you conclude about the relationship between Britain and the colonies at the time Abigail wrote her letter? Britain and the colonists had resolved their differences.

The American colonies were not supporting each other.

Colonies were taking active steps to resist British laws.

Great Britain and the colonies were at war.

PLEASE HELP IF YOU HELP ILL ANSWER ONE OF YOURS

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 21.06.2019 18:50
Acar traveling at 65 mile per hour has kinetic energy because of its position on the road. true or false
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 00:00
Describe how gravity and convection work together to move the plates in the plate tectonics theory
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 18:30
Why do you think kush in nubia is not as well-known as egypt? ( me with my exit ticket)
Answers: 3
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 06:00
Ahusband who believed that his wife was having an affair with his brother hired an arsonist to burn down the brother's house. they planned for the husband to take his brother to a ballgame so that the arsonist would be able to set the house on fire without detection. after the husband and brother left for the ballgame, however, the arsonist decided to abandon the plan and immediately left town without doing anything further. when the husband returned from the ballgame with the brother, he saw the house still standing and blurted out what was supposed to have happened. the husband and the arsonist were arrested and charged with conspiracy to commit arson. at the arsonist's trial, his attorney argued that he was innocent of the conspiracy because he decided not to go ahead with the plan, and nothing criminal had in fact occurred.at common law, how should a jury find the arsonist? a not guilty of conspiracy, because going to a ballgame is not a criminal overt act.b not guilty of conspiracy, because the husband, not the arsonist, committed the overt act.c guilty, because the husband executed his part of the plan.d guilty, because the arsonist agreed to set the brother's house on fire.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Based on the part of the letter that you just read, what can you conclude about the relationship bet...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 29.08.2019 01:30
Questions on the website: 13722361