A surgeon performs elective surgery on John Smith. Smith later complains to his surgeon about pain resulting from the surgery. His surgeon dismisses his complaints as not credible and eventually withdraws from the case. Smith is then treated by another surgeon, who determines that Smith developed complications from surgery and that the delay in treatment has made the complications worse. Smith sees an attorney about a possible lawsuit against the first surgeon. Required:
Describe the theories that could support a lawsuit under these circumstances.

Aresearcher proposes to conduct a study at a foreign site. the research has been determined to be exempt from the federal regulations by institutional policy. according to federal regulations, is review required at the foreign site? if a proposed study qualifies for exemption, federal regulations do not require review at the foreign site where it will be conducted but still require review at the u.s. site by the institution’s irb. if a proposed study qualifies for exemption, federal regulations do not require review at the foreign site where it will be conducted. if a proposed study qualifies for exemption, federal regulations do require review at the foreign site where it will be conducted. if a proposed study qualifies for exemption, federal regulations do not require review at the foreign site where it will be conducted, but still require review by the institutional official at the local site.

Plz i need i really don’t want to fail i’m only 14. can somebody write a rough draft for me. about how tighter british control led to a revolution in colonial america has to be at least 4 paragraphs plz me passing depends on this plz

The provisions of subpart d, of the hhs regulations, additional protections for children involved as subjects in research apply to: all research involving childrenall research that is > minimal riskall research funded by any federal agencyall research funded by hhs