Read this law from the Code of Hammurabi and think about which parts seem familiar to you. Then answer the question below. 8. If any one steal cattle or sheep, or [a donkey], or a pig or a goat, if it belong to [a temple] or to the court, the thief shall pay [30 times what the animal is worth]; if they belonged to a freed man of the king he shall pay tenfold; if the thief has nothing with which to pay he shall be put to death. 1
In one or two paragraphs, describe at least one important clue that this law provides about life in ancient Babylon. With this clue in mind, also describe how the society you live in is different from or similar to Babylonian society. Support your response with details from the law and examples from everyday life.

30 times what the animal is worth is not a reasonable punishment because the animal returns to its owner. If they belonged to a freed man of the king he shall pay tenfold, death, is not reasonable too, 30 times what the animal is worth should be 10 times because its too much and If they belonged to a freed man of the king, he shall spend the week/month in jail. this law was unfair and I do not believe this should go on in ancient Babylon.

- world peace, cause that's important

- iron man to still be alive, cause i cried my eyes out

- for those in starving places like africa to get the support that they need for food and water, cause they r humans and need those basic things go be alive.

if interdependence implies a two-way dependence, and if each partner is equally dependent on the other for success, then there is an equal commitment to the making the partnership successful. the advantage is sustainability of the relationship, the disadvantage is that decisions are "democratic" and therefore may take longer to reach and more likely to be a compromise (which is not always the best solution). as the interdependence moves away from equality, the decisions become more influenced by the more independent partner. in the extreme the relationship becomes more dictatorial and more like "master-slave". generally the relationship has less commitment in both directions and is more likely to be temporary.

if one generalizes (and one shouldn't), equity partnerships, which is probably what is implied by interdependence, can be slow to progress or change but durable. the extreme alternative, independent-dependent partnerships tend to be efficient but more fragile.

hope this but you will have to site your own evidence. : )