Francine rolled a marble down a ramp and timed how long it took for the marble to reach the bottom of the ramp. After one trial, she doubled the height of the ramp and added a thick layer of wool cloth to the surface of the ramp. She conducted three more trials and after reviewing the data, Francine concluded that the height of the ramp had no effect on the speed of the marble rolling down the slope. Which of the following reasons best describes why her conclusion is unsupported?

Growth of the business (be sure to use the terms “culture” and “cultural diffusion” in this section.) of debbie fields. plz me

List one personal value and explain why it’s important to you

The authors of the paper "fudging the numbers: distributing chocolate influences student evaluations of an undergraduate course"† carried out a study to see if events unrelated to an undergraduate course could affect student evaluations. students enrolled in statistics courses taught by the same instructor participated in the study. all students attended the same lectures and one of six discussion sections that met once a week. at the end of the course, the researchers chose three of the discussion sections to be the "chocolate group." students in these three sections were offered chocolate prior to having them fill out course evaluations. students in the other three sections were not offered chocolate. the researchers concluded that "overall, students offered chocolate gave more positive evaluations than students not offered chocolate." indicate whether the study is an observational study or an experiment. give a brief explanation for your choice.