subject
Social Studies, 07.10.2020 22:01 simmonss1185

Which of the following statements is false? A. The theoretical concept of the panopticon as a social mechanism for controlling populations comes from an 18th-century prison design crafted by the British theorist Karl Marx. B. The guard tower in a panoptic prison is completely enclosed with mirrored windows, so the prisoners never know when they are being watched. C. The panoptic means of controlling behavior is a pervasive aspect of just about every government. D. The political philosopher Michel Foucault built upon the logic of the panoptic prison design and argued that it was similar to the way governments and leaders maintain control over the societies they rule.

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 11:00
Brainliest to who answers! what will always cause a supply curve to shift to the left?
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 17:40
Say a certain manufacturing industry has 63.1 thousand jobs in 2008, but is expected to decline at an average annual rate of 1.7 thousand jobs per year from 2008 to 2018. assuming this holds true, what will be this industry’s percent change from 2008 to 2018? a. 70% b. -27% c. -17% d. -75%
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 20:40
How has our understanding of the first sentence of the declaration of independence changed over time?
Answers: 3
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 05:30
Athief was passing by a house under construction when he noticed that the ladder being used by workers on the roof had copper braces supporting the rungs. after making sure that the workers on the roof could not see him, the thief used pliers that he had in his pocket to remove all of the copper braces that he could reach from the ground. a short time later, a worker climbed down the ladder and it collapsed. he fell to the ground and severely injured his back. the thief was apprehended a few hours later trying to sell the copper for scrap. a statute in the jurisdiction makes it a felony for "maliciously causing serious physical injury to another." the thief was charged with malicious injury under the statute and was also charged with larceny. after a jury trial in which the above facts were presented, he was convicted of both charges. if he appeals the conviction for the malicious injury charge on grounds of insufficient evidence, how should the court rule? a affirm the conviction, because the thief was engaged in criminal conduct at the time of the act that resulted in the injury. b affirm the conviction, because the jury could have found that the thief acted with malice. c reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief intended to injure anyone. d reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief bore any malice towards the workers on the roof.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Which of the following statements is false? A. The theoretical concept of the panopticon as a social...
Questions
Questions on the website: 13722363