How do you compare the cotton textile industry of Ahmedabad with Osaka. pls ans fast, ill mark u brianliest if u do.

1)Ahmedabad: founder-Ranchoddlal chottalal.

Osaka- takeo yamanobe on the advice of eiichi shibusawa

2) Ahmedabad -water taken from Sabarmati River

Osaka-water taken from Yodo river

3) Ahmedabad -they use hydroelectricity which is cheap

Osaka- they use coal and power resources

4) Ahmedabad -have their own raw material

Osaka-they depend on imported raw materials from USA, India, china, sudan, egypt

5)Ahmedabad-1st mill set up in 1859 and started production on May 30th 1861

Osaka- progress begun after 1877

6)Ahmedabad- skilled and semi-skilled labor force

Osaka- highly skilled and qualified labor force

7)Ahmedabad- their products find a ready internal market

Osaka- they have a good external market in Asia and Africa

8)Ahmedabad-spinning and weaving are done in separate sections in same industrial unit

Osaka-spinning and weaving are done in separate industrial units

9)ahm-their mills failed in the beginning due to stiff competition from British machine made goods

Osaka- they failed in the beginning due to 2nd world war

soothing tone) but quickly, the tone changes from a light tone to a grim one. by introducing disturbing word choices that are illogical.make a list of some of levertov’s images of war from both of her poems. how do her wordsaffect you? do you agree with her position on war? write a short response (at least 100 words) and support your answer with personal experience or your studiespoets can change the tone in a poem, and levertov does when the she refers to "delicate man . .whose eyes/are flowers that perceive the stars”. the word choices here are different. theimages began to show feelings of hope/potential. but this mood is interrupted with the dark oppressive words "entrails of still-alive babies" and "carcass-gulleys". levertov continues to switch tones by "the deep intelligence living at peace would have"—one is left with a sense of hope. i can connect with her words that humans can do better things than fight in war. we only have one life so dying in a war would be for no reason. also, i am a christian and in the bible, it says "thou shall not kill", and i strongly believe in that.people respond differently to satire—some like it, others don't get it. in at least 150 words, describe what you think of goines's narrative essay. discuss whether you think his position is convincing.the satire kept people's attention, rather than just rambling. instead of being dead serious, he adds humor to enlighten it. i think he did a good job of proving his point, but convincing people to stray from their own beliefs is hard, and satire can be offensive to that person. overall i think that goines's narrative essay was good because narrative essay create deeper understanding. i also like that the narrative essay is in first-person. the essay was filled with diction and word choice to let you know that the essay is going to be witty yet satirical. his point was to write  

explanation:

you probably know the answer. stop asking stupid questions and making me waste my time. j.k. ; )   b.t.w. what are three ratios equivalent to 5 : 11? thx