subject
Social Studies, 27.09.2020 16:01 XxKaitlynnxX

Do you guys agree with this statement yes or no Statement:

Effective September 17, 2021, schools will close every year in honor of Constitution Day.

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 02:30
The document shows a personal allowances worksheet. this document is part of a
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 21:00
Sociology of medicine refers to the study of how social factors affect
Answers: 3
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 05:30
Athief was passing by a house under construction when he noticed that the ladder being used by workers on the roof had copper braces supporting the rungs. after making sure that the workers on the roof could not see him, the thief used pliers that he had in his pocket to remove all of the copper braces that he could reach from the ground. a short time later, a worker climbed down the ladder and it collapsed. he fell to the ground and severely injured his back. the thief was apprehended a few hours later trying to sell the copper for scrap. a statute in the jurisdiction makes it a felony for "maliciously causing serious physical injury to another." the thief was charged with malicious injury under the statute and was also charged with larceny. after a jury trial in which the above facts were presented, he was convicted of both charges. if he appeals the conviction for the malicious injury charge on grounds of insufficient evidence, how should the court rule? a affirm the conviction, because the thief was engaged in criminal conduct at the time of the act that resulted in the injury. b affirm the conviction, because the jury could have found that the thief acted with malice. c reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief intended to injure anyone. d reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief bore any malice towards the workers on the roof.
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 14:30
Horton automatics and the industrial division of the communications workers of america, the union that represented horton’s workers, negotiated a collective bargaining agreement. if an employee’s discharge for a workplace-rule violation was submitted to arbitration, the agreement limited the arbitrator to determining whether the rule was reasonable and whether the employee had violated it. when horton discharged employee ruben de la garza, the union appealed to arbitration. the arbitrator found that de la garza had violated a reasonable safety rule, but “was not totally convinced” that horton should have treated the violation more seriously than other rule violations. the arbitrator ordered de la garza reinstated. can a court set aside this order
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
Do you guys agree with this statement yes or no Statement:

Effective September 17, 2021...
Questions
question
Chemistry, 16.02.2022 14:00
question
Mathematics, 16.02.2022 14:00
Questions on the website: 13722360