Candidates are reviewed by four separate reviewers and their comments and scores which range from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest) are stored on a review record that is a detail record for a candidatewhat is the best way to indicate that a combined review score of 15 of better is required to recommend that the candidate come in for an interview?A. Use a validation rule on a total score field on the candidate record that prevents a recommended field fomr being true if the total score is less than 15B. Use a workflow rule to calculate the sum of the review scores and send an email to the hiring manager when the total is 15 or betterC. Use visual workflow to set a recommended field on the candidate whenever the cumulative review score is 15 or betterD. Use a rollup summary field to calculates the sum of the review scores, and store this in a total score field on the candidate

If morality represents the way we would like the world to work and economics represents how it actually does work, then the story of feldman’s bagel business lies at the very intersection of morality and economics. yes, a lot of people steal from him, but the vast majority, even though no is watching over them, do not. this outcome may surprise some people—including feldman’s economist friends, who counseled him twenty years ago that his honor-system scheme would never work. but it would not have surprised adam smith. in fact, theme of smith’s first book, the theory of moral sentiments, was the innate honesty of mankind. “how selfish soever man may be supposed,” smith wrote, “there are evidently some principles in his nature which interest him in the fortune of others, and render their happiness necessary to him, though he derives nothing from it, except the pleasure of seeing it.” which best describes the authors’ purpose in using a quotation from adam smith’s book the theory of moral sentiments? to highlight their knowledge of scottish philosophers to prove that people are inherently dishonest to demonstrate that incentive is the driving force behind cheating to lend credibility and additional support to their conclusion