A farmer has developed a new type of fertilizer. this new fertilizercosts 20% more to produce than the old fertilizer but has better results. the same land now produces 25% more crops each year. which statement best describes one way the farm will be affected by using this new fertilizer?

a: the farms marginal cost for fertilizer will increase
b: the farms marginal cost for fertilizer will decrease
c: the farms opportunity cost for using fertilizer will increase
the farms opportunity cost for using fertilizer will decrease

Research and review one of the following cases: 1. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc. 2. young vs ups 3. vance vs ball state university after you have thought through and understand the case answer the following: 1. explain the facts of the case leading to the dispute. 2. define and show understanding of each of the terms assigned to your case. break the laws into components where necessary. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) disparate treatment discrimination, 4)disparate impact discrimination vance vs ball state university: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) hostile work environment, 4) a supervisor for title vii purposes young vs ups: 1) title vii, 2) pregnancy discrimination act, 3)american's with disabilities act, 4) reasonable accommodation 3.how do the above concepts come into play in the case? 4. what rule of law came from the case? what did the court decide? 5. based on your understanding of employment law was the ruling correct? explain using a legal principle.