Question 1
Behaviorists often used introspection to analyze mental processes.
True
O Fa...
Social Studies, 20.09.2020 02:01 SumayahAminaAnsari
Question 1
Behaviorists often used introspection to analyze mental processes.
True
O False
Question 2
Answers: 2
Social Studies, 21.06.2019 17:00
How and why did the 27th amendment modify the authority of congress to set its own pay
Answers: 1
Social Studies, 21.06.2019 21:30
Passport video produced a video documentary titled the definitive elvis, comprising sixteen one-hour episodes. the producers interviewed more than 200 people regarding virtually all aspects of elvis's life. passport sold the videos commercially for a profit. approximately 5 to 10 percent of the videos were composed of copyrighted music and appearances of presley on television and in movies owned by copyright holders other than passport. passport did not obtain permission to use those copyrighted works. elvis presley enterprises, inc., and other companies and individuals that owned copyrights to the presley works used by passport sued passport for copyright infringement. passport defended, arguing that its use of the copyrighted materials was fair use. the u.s. district court held in favor of the plaintiff copyright holders and enjoined passport from further distribution of its documentary videos. passport appealed.did passport act ethically in including the elvis presley copyrighted material in its video? why do you think passport video did so? has there been fair use in this case, or has there been copyright infringement?
Answers: 2
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 20:00
What was the purpose of the federalist papers? a. to revise the articles of confederationb. to oppose ratification of the constitution c. to encourage support for the ratification of the constitutiond. to invite people to the constitutional convention
Answers: 2
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 01:50
Research and review one of the following cases: 1. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc. 2. young vs ups 3. vance vs ball state university after you have thought through and understand the case answer the following: 1. explain the facts of the case leading to the dispute. 2. define and show understanding of each of the terms assigned to your case. break the laws into components where necessary. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) disparate treatment discrimination, 4)disparate impact discrimination vance vs ball state university: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) hostile work environment, 4) a supervisor for title vii purposes young vs ups: 1) title vii, 2) pregnancy discrimination act, 3)american's with disabilities act, 4) reasonable accommodation 3.how do the above concepts come into play in the case? 4. what rule of law came from the case? what did the court decide? 5. based on your understanding of employment law was the ruling correct? explain using a legal principle.
Answers: 2
Mathematics, 25.04.2020 21:52
Mathematics, 25.04.2020 21:52
Biology, 25.04.2020 21:53
English, 25.04.2020 21:53
Mathematics, 25.04.2020 21:53
Health, 25.04.2020 21:53
English, 25.04.2020 21:53
Biology, 25.04.2020 21:53
Health, 25.04.2020 21:53
Mathematics, 25.04.2020 21:53
English, 25.04.2020 21:53