A historian finds documentary evidence of a Ming Dynasty law prohibiting criminals from becoming monks. How could the historian place this decree into an absolute chronology?

A. by examining layers of artifacts buried below the documents
B. by determining if the law was passed before or after the Great Ming Code
C. by using scientific tools to determine the date the documents were created
D. by looking up how long after the believed birth of Jesus the Ming Dynasty occurred

B.by determining if the law was passed before or after the Great Ming Code

Explanation:

If the idea is to place the degree into an absolute chronology, then Option B is the better answer. The Great Ming Code was created in 1373 to regulate all the aspects of Chinese life, including religion, international affairs, social relations, rituals, and economic trades. If the historian found this document, then he must analyze if this law was in the Code or not. Based on this, he can put it in the chronology.

well the unjest treatment and discrimination did get faced by the idians and soldiers

explanation:

the answer is the petition of right.

explanation:

offer to of right, real demand of attesting a benefit against the english crown, the most remarkable point of reference being the petition of right of 1628, which parliament sent to charles i fussing of a movement of oversteps of law. the term also implied the framework (invalidated in 1947) by which a subject could sue the crown.   taking a gander at the frameworks used by maria amidu to make a standard in 2015 commending the 1628 petition of right, which was sent to charles i by the english parliament. at uniquely based law the crown, or the sovereign in his official cutoff, couldn't be sued in the ruler's courts. since the ruler was, really, the superior ace of those courts, coordinating value in them between his subjects, he was not subject to their ward. therefore it transformed into a preparation, at whatever point a subject's certified or individual property had come into the responsibility for ruler or his specialists without legitimate perfect, for the subject to engage the master in chamber for its recovery.