Original Source Material Student Version
There is a design methodology called rapid prototyping, which has been used successfully in software engineering. Given similarities between software design and instructional design, we argue that rapid prototyping is a viable method for instructional design, especially for computer-based instruction.
Which of the following is true for the Student Version above?
A. Word-for-Word plagiarism
B. Paraphrasing plagiarism
C. This is not plagiarism

Full question attached

C. This is not plagiarism

Explanation:

From the above, the student has not committed any plagiarism. This is because the student  referenced the original author's work properly in his own work. There were not word-for-word plagiarisms as student did not quote original author verbatim to require intext citations. Also there was no paraphrasing plagiarism as students work was not a mere modification of vocabulary

they all focused on themes about the inevitability of death.

my man just wants some puu

explanation: