Social Studies, 05.08.2020 17:01 Ksouth13

While shopping for groceries, Abby realized she had misplaced her shopping list. By mentally visualizing the aisles she had walked and the items she had looked at, she was able to recall the exact shelf space where she had placed the list. Her mental visualization most clearly involved:. A) iconic memory.
B) working memory.
C) implicit memory.
D) automatic processing.

Answers: 2

Show answers

Answers

Answer from: bapefer498

B) Working memory

Explanation:

The working memory is part of short term memory that hold information temporarily and is used in cognitive tasks. Working memory has limited capacity and only holds information long enough for it to be used such as in reasoning and following instructions or solving complex maths. This is what was used in the example as the person is able to recall and mentally visualize where and what she had done since it hasn't been long and it is still in the working memory

Answer from: Quest

United states v. nixon, 418 u.s. 683 (1974), was a landmark united states supreme court case that resulted in a unanimous decision against president richard nixon, ordering him to deliver tape recordings and other subpoenaed materials to a federal district court.

Answer from: Quest

the answer is the petition of right.

explanation:

offer to of right, real demand of attesting a benefit against the english crown, the most remarkable point of reference being the petition of right of 1628, which parliament sent to charles i fussing of a movement of oversteps of law. the term also implied the framework (invalidated in 1947) by which a subject could sue the crown. taking a gander at the frameworks used by maria amidu to make a standard in 2015 commending the 1628 petition of right, which was sent to charles i by the english parliament. at uniquely based law the crown, or the sovereign in his official cutoff, couldn't be sued in the ruler's courts. since the ruler was, really, the superior ace of those courts, coordinating value in them between his subjects, he was not subject to their ward. therefore it transformed into a preparation, at whatever point a subject's certified or individual property had come into the responsibility for ruler or his specialists without legitimate perfect, for the subject to engage the master in chamber for its recovery.

Another question on Social Studies

Social Studies, 21.06.2019 22:30

The ideal that all people should be treated equally. a. rule of law b. representative government c. limited government the bill of rights and the declaration of rights both seek to protect a. the separation of powers b. personal liberties c. representative government

Answers: 2

Answer

Social Studies, 23.06.2019 02:30

Which statement is not true about the missouri compromise? 1.) slave owners could pursue escaped slaves into “free” regions. 2.) maine entered the union as a free state. 3.) slavery was allowed throughout the louisiana territory. 4.) missouri entered the union as a slave state.

Answers: 1

Answer

Social Studies, 23.06.2019 09:30

The police of a resort town discovered that a well-known cat burglar was currently living in town under an assumed name. to try to catch her in the act of burglary, an undercover officer approached the burglar with a plan for a burglary. the undercover officer told the burglar that he knew who she was and that he had a plan to steal jewels from someone staying in one of the town's resorts. the burglar initially refused the offer; however, after lengthy cajoling, she finally agreed to the plan. as the time for the burglary drew near, the burglar had second thoughts. three hours before the theft was scheduled to take place, the burglar called the police and told them of the plan. she told them that she was not going to show up, but that her cohort (the undercover officer) would be there, and told them how to recognize the undercover officer. is the burglar guilty of conspiracy at common law?

Answers: 2

Answer

Social Studies, 23.06.2019 14:30

Horton automatics and the industrial division of the communications workers of america, the union that represented hortonâ€™s workers, negotiated a collective bargaining agreement. if an employeeâ€™s discharge for a workplace-rule violation was submitted to arbitration, the agreement limited the arbitrator to determining whether the rule was reasonable and whether the employee had violated it. when horton discharged employee ruben de la garza, the union appealed to arbitration. the arbitrator found that de la garza had violated a reasonable safety rule, but â€śwas not totally convincedâ€ť that horton should have treated the violation more seriously than other rule violations. the arbitrator ordered de la garza reinstated. can a court set aside this order

Answers: 3

Answer

You know the right answer?

While shopping for groceries, Abby realized she had misplaced her shopping list. By mentally visuali...

Questions