Which reason(s) might provide good cause for a Christian to "count it all joy" as James says to do in James 1:2-4?

Explanation:

According to James 1:2-4 Christians should count it all joy when trials and temptation arises, when troubles comes and storm arose as in the case of the disciples on the boat this is because trials and temptation comes for a glory that is ahead, it works patience into believers life, endurance, longsuffering which are fruits of the spirit.

Trials should not be seen as evil but a time to be built up,strengthen spiritually hence, the Joy ahead should be the focus of a believer.

Given that the scripture emphasize that in the world there will be tribulation but as believers be of good cheer for Christ have overcome the world this is the testimony of a believe in distress and trials and that is why James an apostle admonish that believers should count it all Joy for the crown ahead.

european feudalism was a combination of legal and military customs in medieval europe that flourished between the 9th and 15th centuries. broadly defined, it was a way of structuring society around relationships derived from the holding of land in exchange for service or labour.

japanese feudalism. the era of feudalism in japan took place from the 12th through 19th centuries. during that period local rulers, either powerful families or military warlords, dominated the land, while the emperor was merely a figurehead and not a significant political presence.

the answer is the petition of right.

explanation:

offer to of right, real demand of attesting a benefit against the english crown, the most remarkable point of reference being the petition of right of 1628, which parliament sent to charles i fussing of a movement of oversteps of law. the term also implied the framework (invalidated in 1947) by which a subject could sue the crown.   taking a gander at the frameworks used by maria amidu to make a standard in 2015 commending the 1628 petition of right, which was sent to charles i by the english parliament. at uniquely based law the crown, or the sovereign in his official cutoff, couldn't be sued in the ruler's courts. since the ruler was, really, the superior ace of those courts, coordinating value in them between his subjects, he was not subject to their ward. therefore it transformed into a preparation, at whatever point a subject's certified or individual property had come into the responsibility for ruler or his specialists without legitimate perfect, for the subject to engage the master in chamber for its recovery.