subject
Social Studies, 31.07.2020 20:01 carog24

Because BWS and RTS are often difficult for the prosecution to integrate into a trial, many have advocated for testimony about posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) instead. One reason why the use of this diagnosis proves to be more helpful in cases in which the victim kills the batterer is that:

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 21.06.2019 21:00
Troy is the ceo of a manufacturing company, and he is planning to open a new factory in his community.because the new factory will require heavier traffic from delivery trucks and employees' cars, troy is partnering with the city to expand and rebuild roadways in the neighborhood.as part of opening the factory, he also plans to create a new hiring program. because he wants his workers to gain skills, he will also offer them the opportunity to attend college courses to receive business training. which of these outcomes are possible negative externalities? check all that apply. increased traffic in the neighborhood surrounding the factory better roads for drivers in the area more educated workers in the community pollution from trucks making deliveries to the factory new job opportunities in the city
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 18:40
Which of the following is not part of the constitution
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 00:40
The bill of rights includes things such as the right to bear arms and freedom of speech. these are examples of which american value?
Answers: 3
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 06:00
Ahusband who believed that his wife was having an affair with his brother hired an arsonist to burn down the brother's house. they planned for the husband to take his brother to a ballgame so that the arsonist would be able to set the house on fire without detection. after the husband and brother left for the ballgame, however, the arsonist decided to abandon the plan and immediately left town without doing anything further. when the husband returned from the ballgame with the brother, he saw the house still standing and blurted out what was supposed to have happened. the husband and the arsonist were arrested and charged with conspiracy to commit arson. at the arsonist's trial, his attorney argued that he was innocent of the conspiracy because he decided not to go ahead with the plan, and nothing criminal had in fact occurred.at common law, how should a jury find the arsonist? a not guilty of conspiracy, because going to a ballgame is not a criminal overt act.b not guilty of conspiracy, because the husband, not the arsonist, committed the overt act.c guilty, because the husband executed his part of the plan.d guilty, because the arsonist agreed to set the brother's house on fire.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Because BWS and RTS are often difficult for the prosecution to integrate into a trial, many have adv...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 06.05.2021 16:20
question
Mathematics, 06.05.2021 16:20
question
Mathematics, 06.05.2021 16:20
question
Biology, 06.05.2021 16:20
question
Mathematics, 06.05.2021 16:20
Questions on the website: 13722360