The philosophies of John Locke and Robert Nozick can be said to diverge in which of the following respects: a) Nozick defends strict constraints on what the majority can do whereas Locke defends no constraints. b) Locke derives individual rights from the good of society as a whole, whereas Nozick derives rights from individual self-ownership. c) For Locke, the right to life is inalienable, whereas for Nozick, the right may be surrendered by its possessor. d) Nozick defends a pre-political (natural) right to property whereas Locke does not. e) Locke claims that the purpose of government is to secure rights, whereas Nozick claims that its purpose is to secure wealth.

What are the functions of wal-mart? are they the same or different from the functions of wal-mart in our individual lives? how do the two type of functions connect? does wal-mart have both manifest and latent functions? what are they? are there any dysfunctions of wal-mart for society? if so, what are they? how might these dysfunctions serve as incentives or catalysts for social change? conflict questions: does wal-mart affect every group in society in the same way? if not, what are the differences? how does wal-mart perpetuate the inequalities (of gender, race, class, religion, age, sexual orientation, etc.) in our society? how does wal-mart contribute to conflict between unequal groups in our society? how might wal-mart contribute to social change or the amelioration of inequalities in society? interactionist questions: what kind of symbolic world are you likely to encounter inside a wal-mart store, and how does that affect the shopper’s experience? how does wal-mart influence our interpersonal interactions? how do interpersonal interactions shape the wal-mart experience for shoppers? for workers? how does wal-mart contribute to our socially constructed reality?

This is the u.s. naval base attacked by the japanese in 1941 that brought the u.s. into ww ii.

Segregation and separation of classes in american urban environments occurs because of